Why do these articles always show just the side of the story that seem to influence the public to lean toward convicting someone before they are given a chance. Why aren't all of the details included in these articles. Joe Taylor is not a flight risk. He has never missed a court date scheduled in Caddo. And another thing it says "alleged" what does that mean? Is that the same as "assumed"?. And another thing, if you will research a little I believe the only drug conviction this individual has is a possession of marijuana charge. Get the story straight before you print your opinion next time. And quit basing your stories on personal dislike.